• sorry I was away, will make a post on why soon

(text of mine from 2016) Beatings will continue until morale improves / Nickel and a Coke machine

Caamib

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
#1
Beatings will continue until morale improves / Nickel and a Coke machine


Let's imagine you have a Coke machine that throws out Cokes when you throw out nickels in it. So, it appears it works and you use it that way.

While doing it some shithead comes along and says "Hey, that is morally wrong ! You shouldn't do that ! You should throw rocks in a Coke machine, but know that you're not entitled to any Coke and that machines have their needs too yaddayaddayadda..."

Would you listen to him, telling you to put something that will give you no Cokes in a Coke machine, while he's basically acknowledging there is a likely possibility that you won't get any cokes?

The point of this metaphor is - SJW shitheads criticize me for coercing women into sex, impregnating a mentally ill woman, doing some other things I can't talk about etc. but what choice did I have? To treat them with respect and get nothing? Any humane treatment of women only brought upon them despising me. Coercing one woman into sex gave me my best female friend today, using an insane woman for sex enabled me to procreate. Had I had treated them like the cucked mainstream society told me I'd achieve none of that.

I know some of the crazier liberals will find this metaphor with machines insulting to women or whatever deranged bs these mental patients will think of, but they'd say the same if I used a metaphor about chickens giving eggs or something so it's irrelevant - intelligent people will understand.

Scumbags like Amanda Marcotte are manipulating the natural male desire to cherish and protect women when they attack groups like PUAs by saying crazy shit like "Can you imagine what these men would get if they only treated women well?"

And sadly it works for so many men on a primal level.

But once you can overcome that you'll know what you'd get - nothing at all. Nothing but derision and hatred.

There is nothing, absolutely nothing, a modern Western man can get by treating modern Western women like some ladies that lived 100 years ago. They are skanks, they are shit and they want to be treated like shit. If you fail to do so will you will be written off extremely quickly and brutally. They are skanks, they are scum, they are just human feces. They cheated on their "boyfriends" with me, their "boyfriends" cheated on them, they can't stand to be impregnated with a man who'd actually take care of the kids, they are verminous whores.

Feminists even have a term for this - Feminist cookie

The insanity of this position is well explained here

The Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves

I have noticed the same phenomena from feminists. Like the white vagina worshiping nationalists, feminists offer nothing as well. For most men, embracing feminism will not improve his life. It will make it much worse. In fact, feminists have created a phrase for this, “Do you want a cookie?” Yes, I want a cookie. I want lots of cookies. If feminists want men to become feminists, then feminism must produce real tangible improvements in men’ lives. In other words, feminists need to start handing out cookies. Since feminists refuse to hand out cookies, men have no reason to become feminists and every reason to oppose feminism with every fiber of their being.

So much truth in this post. Treating modern Western women as anything but vermin achieved no results for me but pain. Treating them as human garbage they are achieved all the results these monsters are even able to provide.

Why, exactly, should I put stones in a Coke machine and listen to how the machine owes me nothing?
 

Caamib

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
#3
I was accused of rape for having sex with a mentally disabled woman. Which is fucked up because I have autism. But nobody cared about that. I was "der rapist" and got prank called by internet fags for years over it.
That seems fascinating. Who accused you, authorities or a bunch of sickos online? How were you pranked? Please, tell us more on this. When did all this happen?
 
#4
Sickos online. I'm starting to think moral statements are statements of emotions rather than fact due to societal structures that enforce these unspoken, unwritten laws, et al, Foucault, Althusser, Hobbes
 
#6
Sickos online. I'm starting to think moral statements are statements of emotions rather than fact due to societal structures that enforce these unspoken, unwritten laws, et al, Foucault, Althusser, Hobbes
Yeah one should be wary of (())psychology(()) and whatever truth value it claims to have, but I have to think that Kohlberg's stages of morality are more or less correct in their implication. Pre-conventional morality is purely fear of reprisal for something, exhibited by children and chimp-types. Conventional morality is what the overwhelming majority of people subscribe to, which may be legalistic, in which case it often overlaps to a good degree with pre-conventional morality, but often tacks on a few more products of consensus that are tacitly enforced as conditions for social integration. This may come in a number of different forms depending on what structures the person feels beholden to. Post-conventional morality - which is just "morality" according to its traditional definition, the ability to judge an action for oneself starting from consistent principles - is exceedingly rare and fundamentally alien to the normgroid.
 
#7
Hey, I just noticed facebook share buttons at the bottom of the page. Are visitors of this website tracked by advertising companies?

Male feminists don’t think rationally.

If a woman fucks an abusive alpha, she must have been raped as a child or something. But Fs don’t treat her as an actual rape victim and try to find concrete evidence of an individual abuser.
Although they believe many fathers rape their daughters, they never investigate a father of an abusive alpha fucker. This proves the ‘child abuse’ hypothesis is magical thinking whenever applied.

If a parasitical woman bleeds a man dry, feminists will first say that the combination of capitalism and patriarchy forced her to attach herself to a man. They oppose any protections to such a man because it would hurt women they still believe to be innocent (and in the majority). But do they seriously believe no man is too good-hearted and naive and no woman is evil enough for extreme parasitism? Even a mentally disabled man who won a lottery?
Furthermore, they oppose protections because it would help the capitalist machinery. But ask them if protections would be available under socialism and their gynocentrism is exposed. Anybody who isn’t a penniless drunkard working paycheck to paycheck under socialism (a system that I support) will probably get fleeced like a sheep.

Gynocracy is not internally consistent.
 
#8
I naively thought male feminists were an urban legend until I encountered them IRL and online, most of them were just white knights with a bone to pick and probably had internalized self hatred out of competition with other males. The difference is the idea of internalized misogyny is exaggerated because women have a stronger in-group preference than men since men compete for women on a case by case basis. Women may have their squabbles but it's only for the top 1 percent. The playing field for men is much wider and less dense.
 
#9
I naively thought male feminists were an urban legend until I encountered them IRL and online, most of them were just white knights with a bone to pick and probably had internalized self hatred out of competition with other males. The difference is the idea of internalized misogyny is exaggerated because women have a stronger in-group preference than men since men compete for women on a case by case basis. Women may have their squabbles but it's only for the top 1 percent. The playing field for men is much wider and less dense.
It didn't hit me that trannies were real until I logged on Facebook after two years and discovered some girl from primary school was posting minion-tier trans content. She had transitioned to male.
 
#11
"SJW shitheads criticize me for coercing women into sex, impregnating a mentally ill woman, doing some other things I can't talk about etc. but what choice did I have? To treat them with respect and get nothing?"

Yes. Hard to throw off the conditioning, but it must be done. Practically all of those modern females are just whores and skanks. They get fucked by several guys before even reaching adulthood; they're already ruined, so why not use them for pleasure? Makes no real difference.

SJWs and female nature itself isn't rational. They will tell you to do things that don't get you tangible benefits. Whether that's pursuing a worthless degree over getting actual job skills, or treating females like people instead of toys, they always only care about what "feels right" rather than what gets actual results.

Deep down, men don't care about anything but results. And they shouldn't care about anything but results, because they don't get freebies like females (especially modern ones) do, so they can't afford to indulge in nonsense or else the punishment and deprivation resulting from it could be severe.
 
Last edited:
#12
F-t-M trans are rare. usually M-t-F is more common, because, why would you want to make your life harder?
I have a sister who has stated they were FtM trans, or wanted to be. I advised against it. She's 18 now and there used to be talk of her defying my parents and getting surgery to lose her breasts, get on hormones, etc. It hasn't happened yet.

Showed her a video of how FtM trans (usually feminists) get a wake-up call after realizing what a mistake they made. "Oh my gawd male privilege isn't real WTF it's the opposite!"
 
Top